JUDr. Martina Brniaková

  1. Inactive judge at the court Krajský súd Žilina, we register 671 hearings and 390 judgements.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Okresný súd Žilina, we register 2,468 hearings and 1,718 judgements.

Indicators for 2021

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 2
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 1

The judge was mostly assigned to Commercial agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Commercial agenda.

The judge worked 1441 days in the period and was assigned on average 113 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 28.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 49 – 61. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 13.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 15 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 87.2% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66.5%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 188
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 164

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 7.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.5%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 0.9% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.8%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 284.9 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 306 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 147 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 48% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 154.3% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 2
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 1

The judge was mostly assigned to Commercial agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Commercial agenda.

The judge worked 1027 days in the period and was assigned on average 85 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 32 from 40 possible points and ranked on 22 – 30. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 13.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 18.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 85.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 64.9%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 141
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 120

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 8.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.8%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1.2% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 260 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 465 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 155 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 33.3% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 120.4% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 1 and delays prior to case assignment 1.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Obchodná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Obchodnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 618 days and on average was assigned 129 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 83,5% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 63,7%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 79
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 66

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 10,5% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 9,7%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 1,7%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 3,4%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 288 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 226 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 110 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 36,1% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 104% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 26 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 124 – 135. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 11,75 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 14,25 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – 4.– 5.2.2013 Zmenkové a šekové právo, Omšenie 22. – 23.5.2013 Právny styk s cudzinou, Omšenie 23. – 24.9.2013 Obchodné spory, incidenčné spory, Omšenie 30.9. – 1.10.2013 Cezhraničné konkurzy, Omšenie 19. – 22.11.2013 Právomoc a rozhodné právo podľa Nariadenia Brusel 1, Rím 1,2, Omšenie 11.– 12.12.2013 Princípy vnútroštátnej aplikácie práva EÚ, Omšenie
  • 2012 – nebol znížený nápad
  • 2012 – nebol znížený nápad
  • 2012 – 23.2.–24.2.2012, 2 dni, Zmenkové a šekové právo 12.4.–13.4.2012, 2 dni, Prehľad aktuálnej judikatúry v obchodnom práve 21.11.–22.11.2012, 2 dni, Určovanie medzinárodnej príslušnosti /Brusel I/
  • 2011 – 22.2.2011 – 23.2.2011 – zmenkové právo – Omšenie, 28.2.2011 – 1.3:2011 – aplikácia práva EÚ – Omšenie, 18.5.2011 – obchodné záväzky – Banská Bystrica, 21.11.2011 – 22.11.2011 – konkurzné právo – Omšenie,; 2012 – 23.2.–24.2.2012, 2 dni, Zmenkové a šekové právo 12.4.–13.4.2012, 2 dni, Prehľad aktuálnej judikatúry v obchodnom práve 21.11.–22.11.2012, 2 dni, Určovanie medzinárodnej príslušnosti /Brusel I/; 2013 – 4.– 5.2.2013 Zmenkové a šekové právo, Omšenie 22. – 23.5.2013 Právny styk s cudzinou, Omšenie 23. – 24.9.2013 Obchodné spory, incidenčné spory, Omšenie 30.9. – 1.10.2013 Cezhraničné konkurzy, Omšenie 19. – 22.11.2013 Právomoc a rozhodné právo podľa Nariadenia Brusel 1, Rím 1,2, Omšenie 11.– 12.12.2013 Princípy vnútroštátnej aplikácie práva EÚ, Omšenie
  • 2011 – 22.2.2011 – 23.2.2011 – zmenkové právo – Omšenie, 28.2.2011 – 1.3:2011 – aplikácia práva EÚ – Omšenie, 18.5.2011 – obchodné záväzky – Banská Bystrica, 21.11.2011 – 22.11.2011 – konkurzné právo – Omšenie,

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Ostatné
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Potvrdzujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie – Vlastnícke právo k nehnuteľnostiam
    Zrušujúce
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Pripúštajúce spätvzatie návrhu, zrušujúce rozsudok a…
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie – Žaloby proti právoplatným rozhodnutiam a…
    Iná povaha rozhodnutia
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Uznesenie
    Iná povaha rozhodnutia
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Uznesenie – Žaloby proti právoplatným rozhodnutiam a…
    Iná povaha rozhodnutia
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozsudok – Žaloby proti právoplatným rozhodnutiam a…
    Iná povaha rozhodnutia
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Rozsudok – Žaloby proti právoplatným rozhodnutiam a…
    Iná povaha rozhodnutia
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Žaloby proti právoplatným rozhodnutiam a…
    Zrušujúce
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

We do not register any upcoming hearings for the judge yet.

Past hearings

  1. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, preskúmanie rozh. FR č.… Hearing was held on

    Court – Krajský súd Žilina
    Judge – JUDr. Martina Brniaková
    Proposer – W. J.
    Opponent – S. M.
  2. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, preskúmanie rozh. FR č.… Hearing was held on

    Court – Krajský súd Žilina
    Judge – JUDr. Martina Brniaková
    Proposer – V. W.
    Opponent – N. Q.
  3. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, preskúmanie rozh. FR č.… Hearing was held on

    Court – Krajský súd Žilina
    Judge – JUDr. Martina Brniaková
    Proposer – B. J.
    Opponent – V. J.
  4. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, preskúmanie rozh. FR č.… Hearing was held on

    Court – Krajský súd Žilina
    Judge – JUDr. Martina Brniaková
    Proposer – T. H.
    Opponent – C. D.
  5. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, preskúmanie rozh. FR č.… Hearing was held on

    Court – Krajský súd Žilina
    Judge – JUDr. Martina Brniaková
    Proposer – N. F.
    Opponent – C. Y.
  6. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, presk. rozh. č.… Hearing was held on

    Court – Krajský súd Žilina
    Judge – JUDr. Martina Brniaková
    Proposer – O. D.
    Opponent – R. I.
  7. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, preskúmanie rozh. FR č.… Hearing was held on

    Court – Krajský súd Žilina
    Judge – JUDr. Martina Brniaková
    Proposer – D. O.
    Opponent – T. C.
  8. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, preskúmanie rozh. č.… Hearing was held on

    Court – Krajský súd Žilina
    Judge – JUDr. Martina Brniaková
    Proposers – C. T., D. A., D. I., E. V., F. K., H. C., H. D., and H. M.
    Opponent – H. O.
  9. Verejné vyhlásenie rozsudku, preskúmanie rozh. č. 721 124… Hearing was held on

    Court – Krajský súd Žilina
    Judge – JUDr. Martina Brniaková
    Proposer – F. N.
    Opponent – G. B.
  10. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, preskúmanie rozh. č. ÚVZ… Hearing was held on

    Court – Krajský súd Žilina
    Judge – JUDr. Martina Brniaková
    Proposer – A. F.
    Opponent – N. G.
More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.