JUDr. Ján Šulgan

  1. Active judge at the court Okresný súd Lučenec, we register 195 hearings and 1,990 judgements.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Okresný súd Veľký Krtíš, we register 2,640 hearings and 3 judgements.
  1. The judge has been nominated to function for almost 10 years.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is below average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from criminal agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from criminal agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 60.36% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 333 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is worse than average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 105.70% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 163 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 167 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 180.254. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 68 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 39.71% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 777 days in the period and was assigned on average 27 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 17.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 506 – 524. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 4.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 13 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 57.6% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 68.7%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 92
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 53

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 6.1% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 10.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.6% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3.1%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 196.5 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 98 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 43 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 43.9% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 87.1% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Civil agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Civil agenda.

The judge worked 338 days in the period and was assigned on average 28 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 23.5 from 40 possible points and ranked on 286 – 303. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 0 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 23.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 32.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 67.1%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 31
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 10

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 3.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 9.3%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 2.3% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 136 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 298 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 56 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 18.8% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 127.5% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

We do not register any indicators for the judge yet.

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok bez odôvodnenia – Všeobecne nebezpečné…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Uznesenie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Uznesenie – Spotrebiteľské zmluvy
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Trestný rozkaz – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Uznesenie – Starostlivosť o maloletých
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozsudok – Rodina a mládež
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Opravné uznesenie
    Iná povaha rozhodnutia
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Rozhodnutie – Ústavná starostlivosť
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Uznesenie – Ostatné
    Pripúštajúce spätvzatie návrhu, zrušujúce rozsudok a…
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Rozsudok – Rodina a mládež
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, P364/1 písmeno a Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Lučenec
    Judge – JUDr. Ján Šulgan
    Defendant – D. K.
  2. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, P207/1,3 písm b Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Lučenec
    Judge – JUDr. Ján Šulgan
    Defendant – J. G.
  3. Pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, pokračovací zločin krádeže a… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Lučenec
    Judge – JUDr. Ján Šulgan
    Defendant – M. V.
  4. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, prečin porušovania… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Lučenec
    Judge – JUDr. Ján Šulgan
    Defendant – C. R.
  5. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, P259/1 písm. g Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Lučenec
    Judge – JUDr. Ján Šulgan
    Defendant – Z. N.
  6. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, prečin nevyplatenia mzdy… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Lučenec
    Judge – JUDr. Ján Šulgan
    Defendant – Y. X.
  7. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, prečin krádeže Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Lučenec
    Judge – JUDr. Ján Šulgan
    Defendant – E. R.
  8. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, P302/1, P245/1 Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Lučenec
    Judge – JUDr. Ján Šulgan
    Defendant – J. B.
  9. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, o schválenie dohody o… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Okresný súd Lučenec
    Judge – JUDr. Ján Šulgan
    Defendant – R. V.
  10. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, Z172/3 Hearing will be held on

More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, P348/1 písm. d), P289/1 Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Lučenec
    Judge – JUDr. Ján Šulgan
    Defendant – A. O.
  2. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, o schválenie dohody o… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Lučenec
    Judge – JUDr. Ján Šulgan
    Defendants – V. X. and W. C.
  3. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, Z208/1 písm.a, b, c… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Lučenec
    Judge – JUDr. Ján Šulgan
    Defendants – F. I. and Y. I.
  4. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, P364/1 písmeno a Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Lučenec
    Judge – JUDr. Ján Šulgan
    Defendant – L. P.
  5. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, o schválenie dohody o… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Lučenec
    Judge – JUDr. Ján Šulgan
    Defendant – W. U.
  6. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, povolenie obnovy konania Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Lučenec
    Judge – JUDr. Ján Šulgan
    Defendant – I. S.
  7. Pojednávanie a rozhodnutie, zrušenie a vysporiadanie… Hearing was held on

  8. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, návrh na schválenie… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Lučenec
    Judge – JUDr. Ján Šulgan
    Defendant – D. V.
  9. Hlavné pojednávanie s rozhodnutím, prečin ohrozovania… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Lučenec
    Judge – JUDr. Ján Šulgan
    Defendant – B. D.
  10. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, uloženie ochranného… Hearing was held on

    Court – Okresný súd Lučenec
    Judge – JUDr. Ján Šulgan
    Defendant – A. Q.
More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.