JUDr. Mariana Ginelliová

  1. Active judge at the court Mestský súd Košice, we register 164 hearings and 2,094 judgements.
  2. Inactive judge at the court Okresný súd Košice okolie, we register 3,264 hearings and 20 judgements.

Indicators for 2021

Overall evaluation of the judge is above average.
Incoming cases for the judge in 2021 were mostly from criminal agenda. Judge's decrees in 2021 were mostly from criminal agenda.

Component – Quality

We register 83.79% decrees for the judge, which are confirmed by the higher court in case of an appeal. The median amongst judges is 68,9%. We register 253 decrees concerning appeals.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is better than average.

Component – Effectivity

The judge had overal appointment of cases of 111.42% in 2021. The median amongst judges is 107,9%.
Anticipated time of the judge was based on data from 2021 156 days. Median amongst judges was 224,3 days.
In 2021 the judge decided 244 cases in the observed agendas.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Component – Productivity

Weighted product of the judge in 2021 was 265.163. Median amongst judges was 248,1.
For the judge we register 89 unresolved cases at the end of 2021. From those 42.70% are restant cases. Median amongst judges was 39,34% of restant cases from the total number of unresolved cases.
In this dimension the judge belongs to the group that is average.

Overall Evaluation
Evaluation on a scale from 0 to 10.

Indicators for 2017

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in translation missing: en.judges.indicators_2015.basic.decided_agenda.trestná.

The judge worked 1431 days in the period and was assigned on average 123 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2017, the judge received in total 30 from 40 possible points and ranked on 28 – 33. place of 651 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 12 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 18 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 80.4% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 66%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 143
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 115

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.7%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 2.9%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 85.3 days. The average at the end of 2017 was 340.8 days.

The judge had 75 unresolved cases at the end of 2017. The average was 192.7 cases.

The judge had 22 restant cases at the end of 2017. The average was 111.7. This represents 29.3% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 54.1%.

In 2017, the judge was able to resolve 113.8% of assigned cases. Average was 141.8%.

Indicators for 2015

Number of Constitutional Court decisions against the judge:

  • Issued – 0
  • Delays prior to case assignment – 0

The judge was mostly assigned to Criminal agenda. The judge mostly issued judgements in Criminal agenda.

The judge worked 1041 days in the period and was assigned on average 92 cases per 100 days in main agendas.

Evaluation

In 2015, the judge received in total 29 from 40 possible points and ranked on 74 – 90. place of 738 evaluated judges.

  • Quality – 10.5 out of 15 points
  • Effectivity – 18.5 out of 25 points

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality Indicators

The judge's judgements were on appeal affirmed in 77.3% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 63.8%.

  • Number of Appellate Decisions – 97
  • Number of Affirmed Decisions – 75

An appeal against the judge's judgements is filed in 4.5% of cases. The average in the same agenda is 8.1%.

Of the total number of the judge's judgements 1% is changed or reversed. The average in the same agenda is 3%.

Effectivity Indicators

Estimated average length of proceedings is 93 days. The average at the end of 2015 was 339 days.

The judge had 106 unresolved cases at the end of 2015. The average was 377 cases.

The judge had 32 restant cases at the end of 2015. The average was 150. This represents 30.2% of the judge's unresolved cases. Average was 42.6%.

In 2015, the judge was able to resolve 103% of assigned cases. Average was 97.1%.

Indicators for 2013

The number of Constitutional court judgements against the judges – issued 0 and delays prior to case assignment 0.

For the judge we register performance data for years 2011 – 2013:

Sudcovi bola prideľovaná najmä Trestná agenda. Sudca rozhodoval najmä v Trestnej agende.

The judge in this period worked 634 days and on average was assigned 105 cases in 10 days in main agendas.

Chart Comparison

Legend
Advanced Comparison
The chart is most useful for comparisons of judges at the same or similar courts, and those who decide cases in the same or similar agenda. Specific courts and agendas have an impact on the overall performance of judges. Simply put, commercial judge from Bratislava and criminal judge from Rožňava decide uncomparable cases.

Quality indicators

Rozhodnutie sudcu bolo v prípade odvolania potvrdené v 64,9% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 52,3%.

  • Number of appellate judgements – 37
  • Number of confirmed judgements – 24

Odvolanie proti rozhodnutiam sudcu je podávané v približne 4,4% prípadoch, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 8,4%.

Z celkového počtu rozhodnutí sudcu je zmenených alebo zrušených 1,5%, pričom priemer v rovnakej agende je 4%.

Efficiency indicators

Odhadovaná priemerná dĺžka konania sporu je 114 dní. Priemer bol na konci roka 346 dní.

Sudca mal na konci roka 2013 nevybavených 94 prípadov. Priemer bol 238.

Sudca mal na konci roka 37 reštančných vecí, pričom priemer je 126. To u sudcu tvorí 35,2% z nevybavených vecí. Priemer je 43,4.

Sudca dokázal v roku 2013 vybaviť, k počtu pridelených vecí, 126,4% prípadov. Priemer bol 99,6%.

Sudca získal podľa našej metodológie celkovo 30 bodov. Spomedzi 739 hodnotených sudcov sa umiestnil na 34 – 35. mieste. Za kvalitu získal 11 z 15 možných bodov, za efektivitu 19 z 25.

Notes

obtained from annual statistical reports of judges pertaining to indicators.

  • 2013 – 28.11.2013 – "Odborný seminár sudcov" – poslucháč; 17.12.2013 – "Práca s aplikáciou APD" – poslucháč
  • 2013 – 28.11.2013 – "Odborný seminár sudcov" – poslucháč; 17.12.2013 – "Práca s aplikáciou APD" – poslucháč

Published judgements

  1. Rozsudok – Poriadok vo verejných veciach
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  2. Trestný rozkaz – Poriadok vo verejných veciach
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  3. Trestný rozkaz – Iné práva a slobody
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  4. Trestný rozkaz – Sloboda a ľudská dôstojnosť
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  5. Trestný rozkaz – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  6. Rozsudok – Život a zdravie
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  7. Rozsudok – Majetok
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  8. Trestný rozkaz – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  9. Trestný rozkaz – Všeobecne nebezpečné a proti…
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

  10. Trestný rozkaz – Iné práva a slobody
    Prvostupňové nenapadnuté opravnými prostriedkami
    Judgement was issued on

More judgements

Upcoming hearings

  1. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 4Pv 14/2022 - § 213… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Mestský súd Košice
    Judge – JUDr. Mariana Ginelliová
    Defendant – I. L.
  2. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 1Pv 424/2022 - § 345… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Mestský súd Košice
    Judge – JUDr. Mariana Ginelliová
    Defendant – D. C.
  3. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, § 201/1, § 174/1, 2a… Hearing will be held on

  4. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 4Pv 471/2017 - § 212… Hearing will be held on

  5. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, § 172/1c, 2c , d Tr.… Hearing will be held on

  6. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, Trest povinnej práce Hearing will be held on

  7. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, § 306/1, § 212/1a Tr.… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Mestský súd Košice
    Judge – JUDr. Mariana Ginelliová
    Defendants – B. Z. and R. C.
  8. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, § 289 ods. 1 Tr. zák. 1… Hearing will be held on

  9. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 1Kv 37/2017 - § 277a… Hearing will be held on

  10. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 3Pv 23/2023 - § 360… Hearing will be held on

    Court – Mestský súd Košice
    Judge – JUDr. Mariana Ginelliová
    Defendant – G. F.
More hearings

Past hearings

  1. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, § 201/1, § 174/1, 2a… Hearing was held on

  2. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, zmena spôsobu výkonu… Hearing was held on

  3. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, podmienečné prepustenie Hearing was held on

  4. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, podmienečné… Hearing was held on

  5. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, podmienečné prepustenie Hearing was held on

  6. Verejné zasadnutie s rozhodnutím, zmena spôsobu výkonu… Hearing was held on

  7. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 1Pv175/2023 - § 212… Hearing was held on

    Court – Mestský súd Košice
    Judge – JUDr. Mariana Ginelliová
    Defendant – N. T.
  8. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 1Pv 23/2023 - § 171… Hearing was held on

    Court – Mestský súd Košice
    Judge – JUDr. Mariana Ginelliová
    Defendant – J. O.
  9. Hlavné pojednávanie bez rozhodnutia, 1Pv 2/2022 - § 201a… Hearing was held on

    Court – Mestský súd Košice
    Judge – JUDr. Mariana Ginelliová
    Defendant – T. D.
  10. Verejné zasadnutie bez rozhodnutia, 2Pv 402/2023 - § 212… Hearing was held on

    Court – Mestský súd Košice
    Judge – JUDr. Mariana Ginelliová
    Defendants – C. L. and O. B.
More hearings

Information regarding the court were obtained from the judge list, which was most recently updated on . The information may have been additionally supplemented by the data retrieved from property declarations and statistical reports.